Sunday, December 30, 2012
How Does the FDA Know What Is Safe to Eat or Buy If It Doesn’t Define Safe?More than 90 percent of Americans carry residues of the chemical BPA in our bodies, according to the Centers for Disease Control. We encounter the chemical through every day products such as plastic water bottles, canned food, and ATM receipts, and this steady exposure poses significant risks. Independent scientific studies show that BPA interferes with estrogen and alters the development of the brain, prostate, and breast tissue. The evidence is so strong that 11 states have begun to regulate BPA.
The Food and Drug Administration, however, has delayed taking action on BPA for more than five years—effectively leaving consumers to believe it is safe. Yet when public health organizations ask the agency to explain why it hasn’t protected Americans from this harmful chemical, the FDA stonewalls. NRDC recently had to sue the FDA just to make it comply with our Freedom of Information Act request for material on the agency’s BPA review.
It shouldn’t take a lawsuit for the public to find out what government officials think about health risks posed by consumer products. But as detailed in an exposé by Barry Estabrook in the latest edition of NRDC’s OnEarth Magazine, the agency repeatedly fails to protect Americans from known hazards. Not only does it discount the weight of scientific evidence on issues ranging from antibiotic use to raise livestock to mercury contamination in seafood. But it also has refuses to share how it determines something is free of harm. Read more.
Photo: Lisa Beebe

How Does the FDA Know What Is Safe to Eat or Buy If It Doesn’t Define Safe?
More than 90 percent of Americans carry residues of the chemical BPA in our bodies, according to the Centers for Disease Control. We encounter the chemical through every day products such as plastic water bottles, canned food, and ATM receipts, and this steady exposure poses significant risks. Independent scientific studies show that BPA interferes with estrogen and alters the development of the brain, prostate, and breast tissue. The evidence is so strong that 11 states have begun to regulate BPA.

The Food and Drug Administration, however, has delayed taking action on BPA for more than five years—effectively leaving consumers to believe it is safe. Yet when public health organizations ask the agency to explain why it hasn’t protected Americans from this harmful chemical, the FDA stonewalls. NRDC recently had to sue the FDA just to make it comply with our Freedom of Information Act request for material on the agency’s BPA review.

It shouldn’t take a lawsuit for the public to find out what government officials think about health risks posed by consumer products. But as detailed in an exposé by Barry Estabrook in the latest edition of NRDC’s OnEarth Magazine, the agency repeatedly fails to protect Americans from known hazards. Not only does it discount the weight of scientific evidence on issues ranging from antibiotic use to raise livestock to mercury contamination in seafood. But it also has refuses to share how it determines something is free of harm. Read more.

Photo: Lisa Beebe

Notes

  1. randomactsofchaos reblogged this from other-stuff
  2. other-stuff reblogged this from silas216
  3. environmentalillnessnetwork reblogged this from nrdc
  4. someassemblyrequiredd reblogged this from nrdc
  5. greenhopenetwork reblogged this from nrdc
  6. hypoprepia reblogged this from nrdc
  7. pacefamilychiropractic reblogged this from nrdc
  8. greenupearth reblogged this from nrdc
  9. chantemona reblogged this from nrdc
  10. waxadelica reblogged this from thelastbookicorn
  11. cosmicebb reblogged this from nrdc
  12. lightinwinter reblogged this from nrdc and added:
    Ugh I cannot stand the FDA…
  13. dolcefarniente13 reblogged this from nrdc
  14. silas216 reblogged this from nrdc
  15. zookmurnig reblogged this from countingcrowds
  16. letterstomyoffspring reblogged this from nrdc
  17. oneplusoneequals1 reblogged this from nrdc
  18. countingcrowds reblogged this from nrdc
  19. thelastbookicorn reblogged this from connoririshwright
  20. sawgunnerspinney reblogged this from nrdc
  21. connoririshwright reblogged this from nrdc
  22. ecosentido reblogged this from nrdc
  23. nrdc posted this